The Meeting Most VPs Never Run: A Defect Post-Mortem for Leadership Decisions

Every engineering leader loves a good post-mortem; as long as it’s about code.

But the hardest, most valuable post-mortem your company will ever run
is the one you never put on the calendar:
the Defect Post-Mortem for Leadership Decisions.

The Hidden Bug in the Org Chart

We’ve all seen this pattern.

A high-profile incident hits:
Production goes down. Customers rage. Slack melts.
Within 48 hours, a beautifully color-coded Confluence doc appears.

The team holds a post-mortem.
RCA? Done.
Timeline? Documented.
Follow-ups? Assigned.

We pat ourselves on the back for our transparency.
We say the culture is “blameless.”
And then; everyone moves on.

But here’s the uncomfortable truth:

Most incidents in software are symptoms of a deeper, older defect; one that lives in leadership, not code.

A wrong roadmap call.
A pressure-cooker deadline.
A quietly accepted staffing gap.
A “temporary” process shortcut that became permanent.

These are the root causes of the root causes.

Yet they never make it into the post-mortem because no one is bold enough to hold a mirror up to leadership.

The Bug We Never Debug

Let’s rewind to a moment every VP knows too well.

• The team ships a new feature under duress.
• QA flags unstable builds, but “go live” is non-negotiable.
• Two weeks later, a P0 defect slips into production and triggers a rollback.

The engineering org spends a week analyzing the failure.
CI pipelines, test coverage, flaky data; every angle gets dissected.

But not one slide asks:
“What leadership decision created the conditions for this defect?”

That’s the real post-mortem no one runs.

Because running that meeting means confronting uncomfortable questions:

• Who decided that “time to market” was worth more than “time to verify”?
• Who ignored the early signal when teams said quality debt was rising?
• Who approved an initiative without a rollback plan or risk budget?
• Who set OKRs that rewarded velocity over resilience?

We analyze engineers for bad commits.
But we never analyze ourselves for bad calls.

The Irony of Accountability

When code breaks, we treat it as a system problem.
When leadership choices backfire, we call it “bad luck.”

It’s a form of organizational self-protection:
Leaders prefer to autopsy someone else’s decision surface.

Yet the same logic applies.

Just as every defect has:

• a trigger (what happened),
• a root cause (why it happened), and
• a countermeasure (how to prevent recurrence),

every leadership misstep deserves the same structure.

Call it Decision Debugging.

It’s not about blame.
It’s about treating leadership itself as a system that can produce defects; and can therefore be improved.

Decision Defects 101

If we ran a true post-mortem on leadership choices, we’d discover the same failure patterns we see in code:

In software, we fix these by introducing better validation, stronger feedback loops, and tighter integration tests.

In leadership, the equivalent fix is meta-governance; a willingness to review how we make calls, not just what calls we make.

The Anatomy of a Defect Post-Mortem

So what would this meeting actually look like?

Let’s imagine it.

The incident: a P0 production outage traced to a race condition introduced during a high-risk refactor.

The engineering post-mortem is complete.
Now comes the leadership post-mortem.

1. Set the Premise

“This isn’t about technical RCA. It’s about understanding what leadership decisions created the context for that failure.”

Remind everyone this is blameless, but not toothless.
The goal is reflection, not defense.

2. Identify the Decision Surface

Which choices shaped the path that led here?

• Prioritization of delivery over test coverage.
• Resource allocation that left QA under-staffed.
• Leadership’s decision to skip a pre-release dry run due to schedule risk.

3. Trace the Decision Chain

Ask: “When did we first know this was a risk; and what did we do about it?”

Every org has signals before the storm:

• engineers mentioning “flaky tests” in stand-ups,
• QA flagging coverage drops,
• PMs asking for “just one more feature.”

Decision Post-Mortems surface these ignored pings.

4. Expose the Hidden Incentives

Many “bad decisions” aren’t bad intentions; they’re misaligned incentives.

Maybe a VP was chasing a quarterly OKR.
Maybe product leadership rewarded launches, not learnings.
Maybe risk escalation was culturally discouraged.

Until you expose those reward structures, you’ll keep recreating the same failure pattern.

5. Document Leadership RCAs

Treat each leadership choice like a code defect:

6. Publish It Like Any Post-Mortem

Make it visible. Share it in Confluence. Present it at All-Hands.
Normalize the idea that leadership can have defects too; and can fix them transparently.

Why Most VPs Never Run It

Because it’s terrifying.

Running a leadership post-mortem requires you to publicly admit that your decisions carry operational risk.
It strips away the illusion that leadership is about certainty and control.

It also forces a cultural shift:
from “I’m accountable for outcomes” to “I’m accountable for the system that produces outcomes.”

That’s a big psychological leap.

It means asking yourself:

• Did I create a culture where risk escalation feels safe?
• Did I reward engineers for raising concerns, not just resolving them?
• Did I leave enough buffer for the unknowns, or did I design fragility into the plan?
• Did my “urgent” decision break someone else’s long-term architecture?

Most leaders don’t ask these questions until a crisis forces them to.
By then, it’s too late.

What Happens When You Do Run It

When you do run a Defect Post-Mortem for leadership, several things change; fast.

1. Psychological Safety Moves Up the Org Chart

Teams stop fearing escalation because they see leaders modeling it.
If the VP can say “I made a bad call,” then a junior dev can say “I missed a test.”

Blame dissipates.
Learning accelerates.

2. Strategic Debt Becomes Visible

Just like technical debt, leadership carries strategic debt; the accumulation of deferred decisions, outdated assumptions, and reactive pivots.

Running post-mortems exposes this debt before it explodes into a crisis.

3. Metrics Get Healthier

Because you stop optimizing for speed alone.
You start optimizing for integrity of decision-making.

Velocity stabilizes.
Flake rates drop.
Rework decreases.
Retention improves.

And ironically; your org ships faster.

4. Culture Evolves from Heroic to Systemic

When leaders debug their own behavior, teams stop glorifying heroics.
They stop celebrating “firefighters” and start valuing fire prevention.

That’s how true operational excellence is born; not from smarter engineers, but from wiser leadership loops.

The Hardest Slide in Every Deck

In every leadership post-mortem I’ve run, there’s always one slide that hurts.

It’s the moment you realize:

The outage wasn’t a surprise.
We just ignored the early warnings because they were inconvenient to the roadmap.

That’s when silence fills the room.
That’s when humility returns.

And that’s when transformation begins.

Because now the team sees that leadership is willing to be audited by its own standards.

The Playbook for Decision Debugging

If you’re serious about institutionalizing this, start small.
Here’s a simple framework you can plug into your ops rhythm.

1. Add a “Leadership RCA” section to every post-mortem.

• What decision chain contributed?
• Which incentive misalignment encouraged it?
• What new check or metric would surface this earlier next time?

2. Schedule quarterly “Leadership Retros.”

Treat it like a sprint retro, but for executives.
Prompt questions:

• Which major calls aged well?
• Which created unintended side effects?
• What’s the delta between what we expected and what happened?

3. Introduce Decision Hygiene.

For every critical initiative, require:

• Pre-Mortem: “How might this fail?”
• Decision Log: rationale, trade-offs, data sources.
• Sunset Review: did the outcome justify the decision?

It’s like automated tests for your judgment.

4. Create a Quality Budget at the leadership level.

Set aside time, money, and attention for post-mortems that aren’t about code.
If quality is everyone’s job, governance quality must be too.

Real-World Example: The Feature That Broke Trust

A client I once advised had a $2 million feature launch fail spectacularly.

They blamed test coverage and flaky CI for the outage.
But when we ran a Leadership RCA, we found the real defect:

• Product had cut QA staff to fund a marketing push.
• Leadership overrode a “hold” recommendation because competitors were shipping.
• OKRs incentivized delivery speed over defect rate.

The technical issue was a downstream symptom.
The root cause was an executive shortcut.

That realization reshaped the company’s governance:
They added a “Decision Risk Review” to every launch checklist.
Within a quarter, production incidents dropped 47%.

Not because engineers got better; because leaders did.

Why This Matters More Than Ever

In 2025, AI will write half your test cases and generate your post-mortem summaries for you.

But no AI can yet run a Defect Post-Mortem on human judgment.

That’s still our job.

And if we don’t build that muscle, we’ll drown in a sea of technically perfect systems led by emotionally blind leadership.

The next generation of great engineering cultures won’t be defined by automation coverage.
They’ll be defined by decision quality.

Final Reflection

Every defect tells a story.
Most stories end at the edge of code.
The best leaders read the sequel; the one that begins where their own decision trail starts.

So the next time your org runs a post-mortem, ask one extra question:

“If we rewound the leadership timeline, what decision would we make differently?”

That single question is the gateway to maturity, integrity, and operational truth.

Because the real outage isn’t when servers go down.
It’s when leadership stops being debugged.

Call to Action

If you’re a VP, run this meeting once - just once - and watch what happens.

You’ll discover that vulnerability scales faster than velocity.
And that every great engineering culture begins with a leader brave enough to say:

“The bug was mine - and I’m fixing it.”

👉 Want more posts like this? Subscribe and get the next one straight to your inbox.  Subscribe to the Blog or Follow me on LinkedIn